I'm going to put off for a bit the follow-up post about the Imperialism map-making experiment. Suffice it to say for now that it's going okay but not without some obstacles to overcome. But I'm still confident of making a go of it.
As indicated in the first post, this imagi-nations world war is inspired by the campaign guidelines laid out in Phil Dunn's Sea Battle Games book. Hence the planned emphasis will be on naval activity, but you know me, can't resist painting some soldiers too. The action on land will hopefully take on a more concrete form than abstract battles between 10,000 man blocks, but with smaller skirmishes representing much larger scale battles.
It was the introduction of the WTJ series of Rapid Prototyped Plastic models which inspired me to backdate the project to the pre-dreadnought era. And 1/1800 is the scale of choice, for several reasons. First, it seems a reasonable compromise between the playability of 1/2400 and the appealing detail of 1/1200. Secondly, available models: WTJ, some additional offerings on Shapeways, and the opportunity to use my antique lead BMC ships. And 1/1800 is about as small as I can reasonably go with scratch-building. Yes, I could probably build 1/2400, but wouldn't be able to improve much, if at all, on Panzerschiffe where the ease of buying inexpensive commercial models would render my own labor hours a waste of time.
My plan is to adapt the Dunn template of real ships renamed for ficticious navies. But not to the extent of drawing playing cards to randomly assign them to the player's fleets regardless of national origin. My intention is, for the most part, to group the ships in their historical fleets with accurate color schemes. The models should retain some commercial value if I later divest myself of the collection or upon my demise.
Which navies are essential ? I think the following:
* Britain
* USA
* Germany
* France
* Japan
* Russsia
That almost completely takes care of the 7 Great Powers in the Imerialism scheme, perhaps some combination of Italy/Spain or Austria-Hungary for the other. And who is not to say that Minor powers won't have fleets as well ? Of course they could.
With that lengthy preamble out of the way, let's take a look at a recent scratchbuilding effort, a French Danton class battleship. I did this model at 1/1800 scale, the usual composite materials of wood, styrene and brass wire. I also used balsa wood in places in lieu of basswood, not entirely happy with the appearance of the model on that score but it did save some time. Having based the ship on the Jane's Fighting Ships plan, not surprisingly the freeboard is a bit accentuated relative to the prototype:
A few more pics:
Not the greatest build as I was a bit rusty. Nevertheless, satisfactory. I did choose to make it a bit simpler than what I did here with the Austro-Hungarian battleships:
Upcoming posts: follow-up about the map, some words about the army figures and a few more BMC ships reworked. I have on order some WTJ ships as well as a few from Shapeways but the lead time on scheduling the production runs of these models means it'll be another week or two before anything arrives.
If there are any specific ships that you want from WTJ, I would urge you to email Jim at WTJ and suggest them:
ReplyDeletewebmaster@wtj.com
I did that and a few days later one of the ones I asked for appeared. Of course it was already "in the queue", but it wasn't one of the ones at the head of the line. I think that it got "bumped up" because of my (and possibly other) request.
Anyway, it is worth asking.
-- Jeff
PS, I really like the pre-WWI paint schemes too. Much nicer than grey, grey, grey.
Thanks for the suggestion, Jeff. I did receive an e-mail from WTJ advising me of the production cycle time and estimated shipping date. I got the impression that the way to jump my ships ahead in the queue was paying extra, I'll wait.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you on the colors. I'll probably keep the British in gray since I started them like that, also gray for the Japanese. The rest will be more colorful. I know the US Navy painted over the white/buff scheme when they went to war with Spain but I plan to go with the Great White Fleet look.
Regards,
Steve
I'm using the Great White Fleet look for the US too.
ReplyDeleteI did see where the German fleet was supposedly painted with dark grey hulls and light grey upperworks . . . but most of the period photos I've seen seem to have the reverse of this.
-- Jeff
I'm going to paint "German" ships uniformly light gray.
ReplyDeleteHi Steve,
ReplyDeleteBeautiful looking models as ever and I am really excited at the prospect of your efforts at this. My only question - Ottoman Turkey?
I love the idea of the WTJ models and have them in mind for some of my own ideas.
All the best,
DC
HI, David. Thanks for the kind words on the ships.
ReplyDeleteUm, yes - I did neglect the Ottomans, didn't I ? It's interesting that the random Imperialism maps often generate nations with Turkish sounding province names, Certainly that would make an easy fit for an Ottoman style navy, even a small one.
Regards,
Steve
Hi, I just follow your blog for a while now. It really inspires me! :)
ReplyDeleteI'm a big fan of the french navy of that period -the Jules Verne style ships -just keep building them, they are nice!
Thanks, pati13 ! You made me laugh with the Jules Verne reference - very apt. The French indeed built some very strange looking ships.
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Steve
Steve,
ReplyDeleteI'm very interested to see how you get on with your Weltkrieg. I am embarking on something similar, also based on P Dunn's campaign rules. Mine will be set in WWII (because I have the models for that period), using Naval Thunder and/or General Quarters for the tabletop fighting.
I'm particularly keen to hear how you get on with the campaign rules and which aspects need expanding. I get the feeling that the rules may not have been used that much in anger, and may have some holes that need plugging.
Yours,
IanH, Warminster, UK.
Hi, Ian.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your thoughts. I see your point about the Dunn campaign rules. Yes, it seems they may be more on the order of an outline, a general set of guidlines as opposed to covering various aspects on sea, land and air in detail.
And perhaps that's a good thing, if they serve to stimulate enthusiasm for a campaign game, provide some general guidelines for how to set it up, and giving attention to less glamorous aspects such as industrial infastructure, port facilities, transport capacity and the like, there's real value in it.
Regards,
Steve